Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 14,538
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Colorado totaled $364,131,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $3,451,858 |
2 | Bcjj Farms | Byers, CO 80103 | $1,625,836 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,367,952 |
4 | Charles Klausner Damian Klausner George Klausner P | Roggen, CO 80652 | $1,067,026 |
5 | Reystead Family Partnership | Haswell, CO 81045 | $1,060,951 |
6 | Alpine Five | Burlington, CO 80807 | $1,013,098 |
7 | Carlson Grain Company | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $923,159 |
8 | Progressive Farms | Byers, CO 80103 | $920,174 |
9 | Lundgren Farms LLC | Haxtun, CO 80731 | $852,884 |
10 | Craig Farms Gp | Byers, CO 80103 | $813,004 |
11 | J&k Farm Operations | Bennett, CO 80102 | $804,207 |
12 | Konig Farms | Briggsdale, CO 80611 | $770,138 |
13 | North Fork Farms Of Walsh | Walsh, CO 81090 | $768,423 |
14 | Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $755,774 |
15 | Pachner Agri Enterprises | Akron, CO 80720 | $725,638 |
16 | Oleo Acres | Flagler, CO 80815 | $707,254 |
17 | Collie Farms Partnership | Arriba, CO 80804 | $671,202 |
18 | Double M Farms Gp | Walsh, CO 81090 | $670,694 |
19 | Tri-county Farms Gp | Eads, CO 81036 | $643,048 |
20 | Klausner Bros LLC | Roggen, CO 80652 | $626,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>