Farm Subsidy information
Bent County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Bent County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 909
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bent County, Colorado totaled $141,299,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S & S Land LLC | Ballwin, MO 63021 | $854,135 |
22 | Tyler P Karney | Ordway, CO 81063 | $854,039 |
23 | Robert Reyher | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $814,828 |
24 | Carson Mc Cloy & Son Company | Morse, TX 79062 | $810,035 |
25 | David C Garrett | Montgomery, AL 36125 | $799,808 |
26 | Philip Hemphill | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $787,851 |
27 | Thomas L Wallace | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $772,561 |
28 | Prowers Enterprises LLC | Lamar, CO 81052 | $769,991 |
29 | Rohlman Farms LLC | Pahrump, NV 89048 | $761,123 |
30 | Matthew F Wilson | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $760,477 |
31 | Max G Wilson | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $758,735 |
32 | D & M Farms | Lamar, CO 81052 | $705,865 |
33 | Kelley Wollert | Wiley, CO 81092 | $705,295 |
34 | White Farms & Sons Inc | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $691,835 |
35 | Geraldine Schnabel Trust | Lamar, CO 81052 | $688,047 |
36 | Daniel G Direzza | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $686,990 |
37 | Stace Davis | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $680,570 |
38 | Cecil King | La Junta, CO 81050 | $667,188 |
39 | George W Wilson | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $656,016 |
40 | Roger L Reyher | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $652,951 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”