Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Bent County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 182
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Bent County, Colorado totaled $14,337,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ridley Farms And Ranches Lp | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $814,344 |
2 | Davidson Ranch Ltd Lllp | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $768,701 |
3 | Karney Land & Cattle Inc | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $706,175 |
4 | Jack Sniff Ranch Inc | Hasty, CO 81044 | $628,697 |
5 | J-s Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $602,848 |
6 | John P Sutphin Jr | Lamar, CO 81052 | $590,232 |
7 | David C Garrett | Montgomery, AL 36125 | $579,750 |
8 | Mike Alvin Spady | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $450,572 |
9 | Carson Mc Cloy & Son Company | Morse, TX 79062 | $366,021 |
10 | J Open A Partnership | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $340,302 |
11 | Tyler P Karney | Ordway, CO 81063 | $309,451 |
12 | Brown Brothers Inc | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $290,916 |
13 | Matthew F Wilson | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $277,768 |
14 | James Japhet | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $246,790 |
15 | George W Wilson | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $244,613 |
16 | Ronald Wollert | Wiley, CO 81092 | $228,996 |
17 | Max G Wilson | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $227,569 |
18 | Netherton, Inc. | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $216,234 |
19 | Norman E Dorenkamp Trust No 1 | Holly, CO 81047 | $208,135 |
20 | Thomas L Wallace | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $204,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>