Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Cheyenne County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 50
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Colorado totaled $406,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kern Farms Inc | Calhan, CO 80808 | $4,725 |
22 | Max Waugh | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $4,536 |
23 | Nick Mousel | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $4,464 |
24 | Bet-mar Farms Ltd | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $4,411 |
25 | Stan - Stan Townsend Townsend | Weskan, KS 67762 | $4,210 |
26 | Mitchell Farm Limited Part | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $3,825 |
27 | Larry Beek Trust | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $3,631 |
28 | Mary Evelyn Beek | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $3,630 |
29 | Allen Naugle | Wild Horse, CO 80862 | $3,568 |
30 | Clifford Roy Roberts | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $3,500 |
31 | Larry Dean Smith | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $3,334 |
32 | James R Hadachek Living Trust-james R Hadachek | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $3,121 |
33 | Bud Mockelmann | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $3,100 |
34 | Marvin E Lowe Trust No 1 | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $3,002 |
35 | Troy Ray Smith | Stratton, CO 80836 | $2,951 |
36 | H Lynn Beek | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $2,812 |
37 | Harms Farms | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $2,561 |
38 | Dean R Perry | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $2,216 |
39 | Robert C Mcneely | Kit Carson, CO 80825 | $2,134 |
40 | Casey White | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $1,951 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”