Total Commodity Programs in Cheyenne County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,636
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cheyenne County, Colorado totaled $127,141,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dale Mitchek | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $633,058 |
42 | Kenneth Jacobs | Eads, CO 81036 | $630,400 |
43 | Phillip Montgomery Baker | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $606,867 |
44 | Alan Roth | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $604,914 |
45 | Barry Beek | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $603,418 |
46 | David Ritchey | Kit Carson, CO 80825 | $600,028 |
47 | Todd A Beek | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $597,324 |
48 | Leslie N Akers | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $595,010 |
49 | Harold V Rother | Okarche, OK 73762 | $592,117 |
50 | R J Hoffman | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $588,781 |
51 | Simon Farms | Stratton, CO 80836 | $587,022 |
52 | Sandra K Roth | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $584,124 |
53 | Stan - Stan Townsend Townsend | Weskan, KS 67762 | $582,064 |
54 | Troy Ray Smith | Stratton, CO 80836 | $575,376 |
55 | Dale Mitchek LLC | Goodland, KS 67735 | $570,853 |
56 | Jack A Mitchek Trust No 1 - Jack | Goodland, KS 67735 | $568,249 |
57 | Kristy Rae Ball | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $566,706 |
58 | Ashley Mitchek | Arapahoe, CO 80802 | $558,204 |
59 | Geralyn L Wulff | Clinton, MN 56225 | $552,278 |
60 | S S & N Farms Inc | Colorado Springs, CO 80919 | $546,126 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”