Total Commodity Programs in Conejos County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 492
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Conejos County, Colorado totaled $18,948,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lionel Valdez | La Jara, CO 81140 | $112,987 |
42 | Alfonso F. Vigil Jr. | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $110,331 |
43 | Jesse Lloyd Reynolds | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $108,996 |
44 | Roy E Helms | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $108,511 |
45 | Jayce S Booth | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $106,280 |
46 | Leon Crowther | Sanford, CO 81151 | $105,706 |
47 | Pef Inc | Sanford, CO 81151 | $105,611 |
48 | Ullstrom & Seese Inc | La Jara, CO 81140 | $103,278 |
49 | Derrell P Shawcroft | La Jara, CO 81140 | $99,642 |
50 | La Jara Pharmaceutical Center Inc | La Jara, CO 81140 | $89,821 |
51 | David S Muniz | La Jara, CO 81140 | $88,438 |
52 | Jack Reynolds | Sanford, CO 81151 | $88,000 |
53 | James Paine | Antonito, CO 81120 | $85,458 |
54 | Crowther Family Ltd Partnership | Sanford, CO 81151 | $84,683 |
55 | Paul Or Elaine Faucette Farms | Sanford, CO 81151 | $83,925 |
56 | Marlene Crowther Revocable Trust | Sanford, CO 81151 | $78,888 |
57 | O D Espinoza & Sons Inc | Romeo, CO 81148 | $78,440 |
58 | Mark K Bahr | La Jara, CO 81140 | $78,207 |
59 | Charles Thomas | Sanford, CO 81151 | $77,707 |
60 | Quinlan Land & Cattle Lllp | Antonito, CO 81120 | $77,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”