Total Conservation Programs in Costilla County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 75
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Costilla County, Colorado totaled $541,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sidney Cordova | San Luis, CO 81152 | $1,744 |
42 | Richard Aragon | San Luis, CO 81152 | $1,500 |
43 | Telesfor Gallegos | San Pablo, CO 81153 | $1,411 |
44 | Mary Atkins | Chama, CO 81126 | $1,253 |
45 | Huberto J Maestas | San Pablo, CO 81153 | $1,164 |
46 | Marcella Pacheco | San Luis, CO 81152 | $1,125 |
47 | Larry Atkins | Chama, CO 81126 | $1,076 |
48 | Ernest N Vigil Jr | Chama, CO 81126 | $1,047 |
49 | Gloria R. Kimbrel | San Luis, CO 81152 | $1,000 |
50 | Don Williamson | Fort Worth, TX 76113 | $964 |
51 | Ann Marie Vialpando | San Luis, CO 81152 | $938 |
52 | Aurora C Vialpando | San Luis, CO 81152 | $937 |
53 | Gilbert G Medina | San Pablo, CO 81153 | $891 |
54 | Frank L. Sandoval | Arvada, CO 80005 | $830 |
55 | Robert A Romero | Taos, NM 87571 | $813 |
56 | Joseph F Medina | San Pablo, CO 81153 | $750 |
57 | Art Quintana | San Pablo, CO 81153 | $750 |
58 | Fabian Salazar | San Luis, CO 81152 | $732 |
59 | Maclovio F Gallegos | San Luis, CO 81152 | $680 |
60 | Eugene Lobato Sr | Chama, CO 81126 | $678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”