Farm Subsidy information
Eagle County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Eagle County, Colorado, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eagle County, Colorado totaled $1,885,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gerard Brothers Partnership Lllp Dba Gerard Family | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $494,294 |
2 | Nottingham Ranch Company | Burns, CO 80426 | $248,373 |
3 | James Craig Bair Ranch Co LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $208,231 |
4 | Steve Hammer | Burns, CO 80426 | $102,596 |
5 | Wurtsmith Land & Catl Co Inc | Burns, CO 80426 | $90,803 |
6 | Schlegel Cattle Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $87,901 |
7 | Kristine A Shiner | Dixon, WY 82323 | $85,734 |
8 | Kirk A Shiner | Dixon, WY 82323 | $78,753 |
9 | Blue Hill Enterprises Inc Dba Hammer Ranch | Burns, CO 80426 | $70,807 |
10 | Eight Bar Ranch Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $60,572 |
11 | Albertson Cattle Co Lllp | Burns, CO 80426 | $49,208 |
12 | Reverse Jl Bar Cattle Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $43,773 |
13 | Sara Fitzsimmons | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $25,949 |
14 | Mike Luark | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $22,591 |
15 | , | $15,342 | |
16 | Quarter Circle 8 Lllp | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $14,145 |
17 | Martin Ranch LLC | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $13,905 |
18 | Randy Schlegel | Burns, CO 80426 | $13,432 |
19 | Brett Smith | Rifle, CO 81650 | $12,818 |
20 | Ronald Chris Estes | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $12,749 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>