Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Eagle County, Colorado, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Eagle County, Colorado totaled $164,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James Craig Bair Ranch Co LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $24,222 |
2 | Nottingham Ranch Company | Burns, CO 80426 | $21,340 |
3 | Albertson Cattle Co Lllp | Burns, CO 80426 | $19,091 |
4 | Wurtsmith Land & Catl Co Inc | Burns, CO 80426 | $17,246 |
5 | Gerard Brothers Partnership Lllp Dba Gerard Family | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $12,548 |
6 | Steve Hammer | Burns, CO 80426 | $11,929 |
7 | Reverse Jl Bar Cattle Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $9,358 |
8 | Kristine A Shiner | Dixon, WY 82323 | $8,376 |
9 | Schlegel Cattle Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $7,172 |
10 | Kirk A Shiner | Dixon, WY 82323 | $6,980 |
11 | Eight Bar Ranch Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $6,432 |
12 | , | $2,781 | |
13 | Mike Luark | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $2,613 |
14 | Samantha Kujala | Burns, CO 80426 | $2,586 |
15 | Brett Smith | Rifle, CO 81650 | $2,564 |
16 | J & A Land And Livestock LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $2,227 |
17 | Kevin Wahlert | Burns, CO 80426 | $1,745 |
18 | Ronald Chris Estes | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $1,581 |
19 | Cedar Creek Livestock LLC | Burns, CO 80426 | $1,577 |
20 | Randy Schlegel | Burns, CO 80426 | $1,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>