Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Garfield County, Colorado, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 99
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Garfield County, Colorado totaled $300,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Couey Family Lllp | Silt, CO 81652 | $21,649 |
| 2 | Frank And Sheila Daley Jv | New Castle, CO 81647 | $16,235 |
| 3 | Lazy E Double Bar Ranch Partnership | De Beque, CO 81630 | $14,122 |
| 4 | Mckenzie Cattle Company, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $12,188 |
| 5 | Ryan Hill | Silt, CO 81652 | $9,404 |
| 6 | Mr Chance Tyrel Graham | Collbran, CO 81624 | $8,851 |
| 7 | Warren W Roberts Trust | New Castle, CO 81647 | $8,528 |
| 8 | Nathan Hill | Silt, CO 81652 | $7,836 |
| 9 | Shideler Land & Cattle | Silt, CO 81652 | $7,356 |
| 10 | David K Terrell | Mack, CO 81525 | $7,331 |
| 11 | V Cross LLC | Meeker, CO 81641 | $7,101 |
| 12 | Duke Wheeler | Silt, CO 81652 | $6,984 |
| 13 | Kevin Patrick Roberts | New Castle, CO 81647 | $6,815 |
| 14 | Shidelerosa Lllp | Silt, CO 81652 | $6,715 |
| 15 | J & S Nieslanik Llp | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $6,492 |
| 16 | Jenkins Land & Cattle LLC | New Castle, CO 81647 | $6,327 |
| 17 | Largent Livestock Lllp | De Beque, CO 81630 | $6,212 |
| 18 | Ted Nieslanik | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $6,072 |
| 19 | Paige L Haderlie | Rifle, CO 81650 | $5,387 |
| 20 | Joanne Lisa Couey | Silt, CO 81652 | $5,364 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
