Farm Subsidy information
Prowers County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Prowers County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,721
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Prowers County, Colorado totaled $473,320,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Willhite & Willhite Inc | Holly, CO 81047 | $3,536,817 |
2 | Widener Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $3,476,315 |
3 | Duvall Ranches Inc | Granada, CO 81041 | $3,274,110 |
4 | Steve F Shelton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $3,226,776 |
5 | Diana J Shelton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $3,168,537 |
6 | Barth & Barth Partnership | Holly, CO 81047 | $3,043,123 |
7 | Scott Farms Partnership | Walsh, CO 81090 | $2,666,917 |
8 | J-s Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $2,520,055 |
9 | John Stulp | Lamar, CO 81052 | $2,513,987 |
10 | Jane Stulp | Lamar, CO 81052 | $2,509,320 |
11 | Kerry Hartshorn | Granada, CO 81041 | $2,293,768 |
12 | Donald G Seufer | Holly, CO 81047 | $2,283,750 |
13 | May Farms | Lamar, CO 81052 | $2,201,200 |
14 | Iron Springs Farms | Springfield, CO 81073 | $2,152,761 |
15 | Shawna Hartshorn | Granada, CO 81041 | $2,124,589 |
16 | Chris E Rundell | Lamar, CO 81052 | $2,071,134 |
17 | Georgetta L Tempel | Wiley, CO 81092 | $2,069,821 |
18 | Thompson Farms LLC | Holly, CO 81047 | $2,012,795 |
19 | W Kent Willhite | Holly, CO 81047 | $1,961,104 |
20 | Emick Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $1,861,311 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>