Loan Deficiency in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 379
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Connecticut totaled $6,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Russell Gray | Moosup, CT 06354 | $31,943 |
62 | Spielman Farm LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $31,829 |
63 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $31,494 |
64 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $30,742 |
65 | Clark W Woodmansee III | Preston, CT 06365 | $29,645 |
66 | Collins Powder Hill Farm | Enfield, CT 06082 | $29,509 |
67 | Benjamin J Bielonko II | Suffield, CT 06078 | $29,170 |
68 | Hyde's Dairy Farm LLC | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $28,743 |
69 | Harvey Polinsky | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $28,452 |
70 | Clifford Allyn Sr | Preston, CT 06365 | $27,914 |
71 | Stuart E Gadbois | Salem, CT 06420 | $27,855 |
72 | Lewis A Tanner | New Preston, CT 06777 | $27,789 |
73 | Minnechaug Farms-michael & Paul L | Glastonbury, CT 06033 | $25,462 |
74 | John Ennis | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $25,090 |
75 | Rosalind M Lewis | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $24,485 |
76 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $23,724 |
77 | Roland E Burroughs Jr | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $23,555 |
78 | Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $23,525 |
79 | Davetta M Curtiss | Suffield, CT 06078 | $23,188 |
80 | Cushman Nathan P. And Nathan R. | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $22,836 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”