Counter Cyclical Program in Windham County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 73
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $423,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Willard J Stearns & Sons Inc | Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268 | $6,231 |
22 | Roland E Burroughs Jr | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $6,211 |
23 | Norman Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $6,036 |
24 | David Wildowsky | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $5,063 |
25 | Coatney Hill Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $4,669 |
26 | We-li-kit Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $4,432 |
27 | Russell Gray | Moosup, CT 06354 | $4,306 |
28 | Hibbard Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $4,298 |
29 | Ronald Jordan | Sterling, CT 06377 | $4,296 |
30 | Kenneth M & Suzanne R Buell Rock Maple Farm | Eastford, CT 06242 | $4,152 |
31 | Ranlom Dairy Farm | Ashford, CT 06278 | $4,004 |
32 | Elm Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $3,920 |
33 | Creamery Brook Bison LLC | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $3,628 |
34 | Valley Farm | Pomfret, CT 06259 | $3,492 |
35 | Nancy Macglaflin | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $3,477 |
36 | Mark Rzeznikiewicz | Dayville, CT 06241 | $3,151 |
37 | Elm Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $3,151 |
38 | Mihaliak Dairy Farm | Willington, CT 06279 | $3,110 |
39 | Andrew Davis Farm | Sterling, CT 06377 | $3,044 |
40 | Abbott Spring Farm Lp | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $2,818 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”