Emergency Conservation Program in Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,413
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Florida totaled $106,892,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | K & M Nursery Inc | Boynton Beach, FL 33437 | $200,000 |
42 | Vila And Son Tree Farm Inc | Miami, FL 33170 | $200,000 |
43 | Kenneth Devane Groves Inc | Fort Meade, FL 33841 | $200,000 |
44 | South Naples Citrus Grove | Naples, FL 34114 | $200,000 |
45 | Mike Costa Foliage Inc | Miami, FL 33170 | $200,000 |
46 | United Nursery Corp | Homestead, FL 33030 | $200,000 |
47 | Marquez Farms LLC | Homestead, FL 33031 | $200,000 |
48 | United Nursery LLC | Homestead, FL 33030 | $200,000 |
49 | Wayne T Albritton | Mulberry, FL 33860 | $200,000 |
50 | Travis Resmondo Sod Inc | Dundee, FL 33838 | $200,000 |
51 | Melinda Bishop Farms LLC | Marianna, FL 32448 | $200,000 |
52 | Marcus Bishop Farms, LLC | Marianna, FL 32448 | $200,000 |
53 | Kimberly Bishop Farms, Inc. | Marianna, FL 32448 | $200,000 |
54 | Aris Horticulture Inc | Alva, FL 33920 | $200,000 |
55 | Oakes Farm Inc. | Naples, FL 34109 | $200,000 |
56 | Manuel Diaz Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33032 | $200,000 |
57 | Barron Collier Partnership Lllp | Naples, FL 34105 | $199,999 |
58 | Silver Strand III | Immokalee, FL 34142 | $199,998 |
59 | Best Four LLC | Bono, AR 72416 | $199,995 |
60 | Lake Jem Farms Inc | Mount Dora, FL 32757 | $199,962 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”