Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Alachua County, Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 38
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Alachua County, Florida totaled $477,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Paul Norfleet | Newberry, FL 32669 | $139,590 |
2 | 3d Land & Farm LLC | Newberry, FL 32669 | $71,548 |
3 | Sol Valley Farms, LLC | High Springs, FL 32655 | $45,208 |
4 | Boyd And Son Inc. | Newberry, FL 32669 | $35,071 |
5 | Lochloosa Lake Farms LLC | Ocala, FL 34480 | $29,919 |
6 | Hines Cattle Company LLC | High Springs, FL 32643 | $19,977 |
7 | King Tut Corp Dba Zeezenia Farm | Newberry, FL 32669 | $18,661 |
8 | Shaw & Shaw Farms Partnership, LLC | Alachua, FL 32615 | $18,506 |
9 | Thomas N Boyd | Melrose, FL 32666 | $14,025 |
10 | Hodge Farms Inc | Newberry, FL 32669 | $11,863 |
11 | Hines Farms LLC | High Springs, FL 32643 | $11,309 |
12 | C & V Custom Ag Service Inc | High Springs, FL 32643 | $8,347 |
13 | M And H Farms LLC | Alachua, FL 32615 | $7,474 |
14 | Warren K Mcgehee | Newberry, FL 32669 | $6,321 |
15 | Robert Andrew Crane | Alachua, FL 32616 | $5,639 |
16 | Mark D Colson | Alachua, FL 32615 | $4,952 |
17 | Donald R Green | Newberry, FL 32669 | $3,816 |
18 | Russell Taylor III | Alachua, FL 32615 | $3,631 |
19 | Charles Davis | Alachua, FL 32615 | $2,738 |
20 | Carl Malphurs | Alachua, FL 32615 | $2,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>