Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 189
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $1,967,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rufus C Ogden Jr | Lake City, FL 32055 | $12,975 |
22 | Clint Pittman | Fort White, FL 32038 | $12,638 |
23 | Harvey Faul | Lake City, FL 32024 | $12,448 |
24 | Dwight Pettyjohn | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,349 |
25 | Dale Roberts Thomas | Lake City, FL 32055 | $12,333 |
26 | Troy S Moseley | Fort White, FL 32038 | $12,134 |
27 | Houston John Hubler | Jacksonville, FL 32220 | $11,705 |
28 | I C Terry Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32024 | $11,249 |
29 | Donald W Graham | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $11,225 |
30 | Spring Head Ranch LLC | Lake City, FL 32025 | $11,175 |
31 | Wildflower Farms LLC | Lake City, FL 32025 | $11,017 |
32 | Donald W Cox | Lake City, FL 32024 | $10,519 |
33 | Garrett L Miller | Fort White, FL 32038 | $10,324 |
34 | Stacie Register | Lake City, FL 32056 | $10,116 |
35 | Douglas Moseley | Fort White, FL 32038 | $9,574 |
36 | Douglas D Cartwright | Lake City, FL 32025 | $8,973 |
37 | Deborah San Inocencio | Lake City, FL 32024 | $8,865 |
38 | Mace G Bauer | Lake City, FL 32024 | $8,707 |
39 | Overkill Hill Farms LLC | Fort White, FL 32038 | $8,682 |
40 | Mark Ganskop | Lake City, FL 32055 | $8,591 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”