Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 166
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $2,288,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wayne Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $236,741 |
2 | Kenneth O Dicks Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32025 | $225,941 |
3 | Hunter Ketcham Farming LLC | Lake City, FL 32024 | $186,707 |
4 | Hunter Ketcham Livestock LLC | Lake City, FL 32024 | $88,926 |
5 | Donald W Graham | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $69,956 |
6 | Delvey Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $62,283 |
7 | Rodney S Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $59,877 |
8 | J D Willis LLC | Lake City, FL 32056 | $59,763 |
9 | Charlie H Crawford | Lake City, FL 32024 | $54,160 |
10 | Jeff Willis LLC | Lake City, FL 32056 | $53,940 |
11 | I C Terry Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32024 | $53,849 |
12 | Tifanie Moseley Miller | Lake City, FL 32024 | $51,639 |
13 | Regal Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $48,968 |
14 | Inge Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $44,646 |
15 | Arky Rogers | Lake City, FL 32025 | $43,870 |
16 | Roger Davis | Lake City, FL 32025 | $39,738 |
17 | Roosevelt Dicks | Lake City, FL 32024 | $37,863 |
18 | James Feagle | Lake City, FL 32025 | $33,815 |
19 | Relma K Faul | Lake City, FL 32024 | $33,418 |
20 | James Hunter Ketcham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $30,786 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>