Conservation Reserve Program in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 73
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $795,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Simon Watson Sr Estate | Fort White, FL 32038 | $118,934 |
2 | Ronald Graham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $98,738 |
3 | Nathaniel Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $40,904 |
4 | W H Townsend | Lake City, FL 32055 | $36,843 |
5 | Daisy Bell Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $33,145 |
6 | Charles W Mixson | Windermere, FL 34786 | $32,062 |
7 | Simon Watson Sr | Fort White, FL 32038 | $21,439 |
8 | Robert Watson Estat | Miami, FL 33169 | $20,640 |
9 | Evelyn G Feagle | High Springs, FL 32643 | $18,405 |
10 | John H Hixon | Fort White, FL 32038 | $17,274 |
11 | Joel S Niblack | Lake City, FL 32055 | $15,580 |
12 | Simon Watson Jr | Fort White, FL 32038 | $14,843 |
13 | Alvin Watson | Miami, FL 33169 | $14,430 |
14 | I C Terry Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32024 | $14,304 |
15 | Tally Watson Estate | Valdosta, GA 31601 | $13,580 |
16 | Edward Martin | Lake City, FL 32024 | $13,272 |
17 | Oliver W Saulsby | Augusta, GA 30906 | $13,197 |
18 | Gerald Pearce | Lulu, FL 32061 | $12,255 |
19 | Estate Of Alberta Saulsby | Lake City, FL 32056 | $11,484 |
20 | Harley R Driggers Jr | Lake City, FL 32056 | $10,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>