Total Commodity Programs in DeSoto County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 185
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in DeSoto County, Florida totaled $13,443,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Prairie Creek Dairy Inc | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $1,112,376 |
2 | Vch Holdings LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $698,467 |
3 | Pine Island Dairy Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $652,846 |
4 | Runway Farms LLC | Naples, FL 34105 | $527,463 |
5 | Doyle Carlton III-roman III Ranch | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $500,000 |
6 | C & L Farms Inc | Punta Gorda, FL 33982 | $497,773 |
7 | Eugene H Turner Family Ltd Ptr | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $461,668 |
8 | Brighton Dairies Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34973 | $433,094 |
9 | South Florida Sod Inc | Avon Park, FL 33825 | $427,424 |
10 | Sun Bulb Company Inc | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $363,752 |
11 | King's Nursery LLC | Arcadia, FL 34269 | $347,178 |
12 | Philip W Turner Family Prtn | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $331,234 |
13 | Bar 4j Bar Ranch Inc | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $282,133 |
14 | Turner Cattle Co Llp | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $255,445 |
15 | Bermont Properties LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $250,000 |
16 | Robert J Flint Jr | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $241,868 |
17 | Mjw Ranch LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $236,895 |
18 | Nfc Dairy Llp | North Fort Myers, FL 33918 | $232,299 |
19 | A & A Blueberry LLC | Lithia, FL 33547 | $213,803 |
20 | Phil Turner Farms Inc | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $204,845 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>