Farm Subsidy information
Gilchrist County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Gilchrist County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 810
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gilchrist County, Florida totaled $71,256,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | W B Mathis Jr | Bell, FL 32619 | $222,429 |
62 | C & V Custom Ag Service Inc | High Springs, FL 32643 | $221,335 |
63 | David Mikell | Bell, FL 32619 | $207,934 |
64 | Piedmont Dairy | Trenton, FL 32693 | $206,191 |
65 | Marjorie A Mitchell | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $199,998 |
66 | Piedmont Farms Inc | Jacksonville, FL 32205 | $191,167 |
67 | Randall O Roberts Jr | Bell, FL 32619 | $184,004 |
68 | Jack Cook | Trenton, FL 32693 | $179,263 |
69 | Earl H Olcott | Branford, FL 32008 | $166,203 |
70 | Adam Cook Harvesting Inc | Trenton, FL 32693 | $165,942 |
71 | Larry H Studstill | Trenton, FL 32693 | $165,882 |
72 | Barney O Faircloth | Trenton, FL 32693 | $164,259 |
73 | Trevor W Bass | Newberry, FL 32669 | $162,732 |
74 | Nina Sue Shepherd | Bell, FL 32619 | $162,224 |
75 | Craig C Watson | High Springs, FL 32643 | $161,801 |
76 | Shelby M Crosby | Trenton, FL 32693 | $156,885 |
77 | Lancaster Oil Co Inc | Trenton, FL 32693 | $148,181 |
78 | A M Kelly Jr | Mayo, FL 32066 | $143,077 |
79 | Joshua D Moore | Newberry, FL 32669 | $131,829 |
80 | Patsy Jean Mathis | Bell, FL 32619 | $128,833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”