Total Conservation Programs in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 97
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $793,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Douglas A Holmberg | Dover, FL 33527 | $10,500 |
22 | Little Manatee River Grove | Clearwater, FL 33756 | $10,500 |
23 | Hopewell Land Partners LLC | Winter Haven, FL 33882 | $10,500 |
24 | Blanche S Oswald | Plant City, FL 33566 | $10,459 |
25 | Mable H Mcdonald | Plant City, FL 33564 | $10,348 |
26 | Ornamental Tropical Fish | Plant City, FL 33565 | $10,000 |
27 | William H Mcbride | Tampa, FL 33601 | $9,667 |
28 | James Thomas | Tampa, FL 33637 | $9,000 |
29 | Ronald L Mcclendon | Lithia, FL 33547 | $9,000 |
30 | Charles L Hester | Plant City, FL 33565 | $8,383 |
31 | James Hull | Plant City, FL 33567 | $7,500 |
32 | Anderson & Son Inc | Ruskin, FL 33575 | $7,500 |
33 | Berkshire Investments | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $7,298 |
34 | James F Strickland | Plant City, FL 33567 | $7,238 |
35 | Donald E Hemphill | Plant City, FL 33564 | $7,000 |
36 | B V G Groves Inc | Fort Meade, FL 33841 | $7,000 |
37 | Farkas Groves Inc | Plant City, FL 33567 | $7,000 |
38 | John D White | Plant City, FL 33567 | $6,636 |
39 | Harold B Martin | Sun City Center, FL 33573 | $5,831 |
40 | James N Parks | Valrico, FL 33594 | $5,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”