Total Disaster Programs in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 826

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $67,311,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
1Rickie Simmons & Son Tropical FisRuskin, FL 33570$7,232,465
2Oakridge Fish Hatchery Inc %davidPlant City, FL 33565$5,663,066
3Liles Tropical Fish IncRuskin, FL 33575$2,824,553
4Bb Parker LLC Dba Ed Parker Tropical FishSun City, FL 33586$1,961,597
5Rawlins Tropical Fish Farm LLCLithia, FL 33547$1,674,614
6R P Co IncPlant City, FL 33565$1,644,211
7Mv Aquatics IncPlant City, FL 33565$1,626,273
8Aquatic Collectors Of Florida IncWimauma, FL 33598$1,397,239
9Ledford Tropical Fish Farm IncRiverview, FL 33568$1,244,127
10Under Ground Crop Consulting LLCPlant City, FL 33567$1,025,000
11Wayne Tanner Tropical Fish IncWimauma, FL 33598$981,415
12Steve Simmons Aquatics IncRuskin, FL 33570$977,359
13Ed Parker Trop Fish IncApollo Beach, FL 33572$951,590
14Shannon GainesRuskin, FL 33570$932,928
15Sadler Honey Farm, LLCApollo Beach, FL 33572$581,661
16Benjamin H BurnettGibsonton, FL 33534$566,664
17Carter's Fish Hatchery IncWimauma, FL 33598$534,980
18Two Brothers Bee Farm LLCWimauma, FL 33598$502,936
19Heriberto Cantu FigueroaPlant City, FL 33566$496,780
20Charles D MartinRiverview, FL 33569$484,880

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag