Total Disaster Programs in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 826
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $67,311,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rickie Simmons & Son Tropical Fis | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $7,232,465 |
2 | Oakridge Fish Hatchery Inc %david | Plant City, FL 33565 | $5,663,066 |
3 | Liles Tropical Fish Inc | Ruskin, FL 33575 | $2,824,553 |
4 | Bb Parker LLC Dba Ed Parker Tropical Fish | Sun City, FL 33586 | $1,961,597 |
5 | Rawlins Tropical Fish Farm LLC | Lithia, FL 33547 | $1,674,614 |
6 | R P Co Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,644,211 |
7 | Mv Aquatics Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,626,273 |
8 | Aquatic Collectors Of Florida Inc | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $1,397,239 |
9 | Ledford Tropical Fish Farm Inc | Riverview, FL 33568 | $1,244,127 |
10 | Under Ground Crop Consulting LLC | Plant City, FL 33567 | $1,025,000 |
11 | Wayne Tanner Tropical Fish Inc | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $981,415 |
12 | Steve Simmons Aquatics Inc | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $977,359 |
13 | Ed Parker Trop Fish Inc | Apollo Beach, FL 33572 | $951,590 |
14 | Shannon Gaines | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $932,928 |
15 | Sadler Honey Farm, LLC | Apollo Beach, FL 33572 | $581,661 |
16 | Benjamin H Burnett | Gibsonton, FL 33534 | $566,664 |
17 | Carter's Fish Hatchery Inc | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $534,980 |
18 | Two Brothers Bee Farm LLC | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $502,936 |
19 | Heriberto Cantu Figueroa | Plant City, FL 33566 | $496,780 |
20 | Charles D Martin | Riverview, FL 33569 | $484,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>