Farm Subsidy information
Indian River County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Indian River County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 550
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indian River County, Florida totaled $128,296,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fellsmere Joint Venture Llp | Fellsmere, FL 32948 | $7,943,655 |
2 | Premier Citrus LLC | Wilson, AR 72395 | $3,697,280 |
3 | Banack Family Limited Partnership | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $2,422,588 |
4 | Graves Brothers Company | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $2,178,897 |
5 | Evans Properties Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $2,013,059 |
6 | Robert J Lindsey | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $1,956,374 |
7 | A Duda & Sons Inc | Oviedo, FL 32762 | $1,728,675 |
8 | Bernard A Egan Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $1,484,865 |
9 | Lambeth Citrus Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $1,387,498 |
10 | Riverfront Packing Company | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $998,780 |
11 | Indian River Exchange Packers Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $990,267 |
12 | Thomas S Hammond | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $981,266 |
13 | Campbell Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $913,654 |
14 | The Packers Of Indian River Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $896,250 |
15 | Estes Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $840,563 |
16 | Pellegrino Barone | Loxahatchee, FL 33470 | $830,904 |
17 | Estes Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $781,048 |
18 | M & V LLC | Groveland, FL 34736 | $777,273 |
19 | Fellsmere Joint Venture LLC | Fellsmere, FL 32948 | $737,872 |
20 | Running W Citrus | Fort Myers, FL 33916 | $727,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>