Farm Subsidy information
Pasco County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Pasco County, Florida, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 162
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pasco County, Florida totaled $4,120,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frogmore Fresh, LLC | Tampa, FL 33629 | $608,474 |
2 | W Fisher Bee Farm | Dade City, FL 33525 | $410,721 |
3 | Palm River Dairy LLC | Crystal Springs, FL 33524 | $220,791 |
4 | Secret Promise Ltd | Saint Petersburg, FL 33731 | $193,658 |
5 | Rowland Cattle Company LLC | Dade City, FL 33525 | $161,191 |
6 | Frederick S Long | Polk City, FL 33868 | $105,931 |
7 | Peter C Rumore Jr | Plant City, FL 33565 | $104,866 |
8 | Starkey Blueberry Farm LLC | Trinity, FL 34655 | $101,851 |
9 | Mickieblue Berry LLC | Tampa, FL 33606 | $85,837 |
10 | Running M Ranch & Grove Inc | Dade City, FL 33523 | $84,223 |
11 | 3 Bex Inc | Sumterville, FL 33585 | $71,511 |
12 | Barthle Bro Ranch LLC | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $69,400 |
13 | Pan American Farms LLC | Tampa, FL 33607 | $67,064 |
14 | Cpm2 Inc | Dunedin, FL 34698 | $64,601 |
15 | Suncoast Blueberry Farms Inc | Tampa, FL 33626 | $63,183 |
16 | Jordan & Jordan Inc | Dade City, FL 33526 | $58,884 |
17 | Pat Nathe Groves Inc | Dade City, FL 33523 | $53,812 |
18 | John A Barnett | Zephyrhills, FL 33540 | $47,083 |
19 | Tall Timber Cattle & Grove | Dade City, FL 33523 | $42,252 |
20 | Al-bar Ranch Corporation | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $38,747 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>