Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Candler County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 49
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Candler County, Georgia totaled $1,699,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Miles Patterson | Metter, GA 30439 | $203,190 |
2 | Hackle Farms LLC | Cobbtown, GA 30420 | $194,380 |
3 | James Boyd Johnson | Twin City, GA 30471 | $182,318 |
4 | James B Johnson Jr | Twin City, GA 30471 | $122,371 |
5 | William Blake Johnson | Twin City, GA 30471 | $109,884 |
6 | Randy Durden | Metter, GA 30439 | $90,983 |
7 | Daniel A Durden | Metter, GA 30439 | $89,727 |
8 | Bowen Patterson | Metter, GA 30439 | $82,185 |
9 | Dawn Patterson | Metter, GA 30439 | $82,185 |
10 | R E Hendrix Farms In | Metter, GA 30439 | $71,324 |
11 | William H Bird | Metter, GA 30439 | $52,169 |
12 | Ralph Wesley Clifton | Metter, GA 30439 | $51,724 |
13 | Johnson Farm Partners LLC J Boyd | Twin City, GA 30471 | $39,270 |
14 | William Rooks Bird | Metter, GA 30439 | $38,912 |
15 | Joseph Reid Bird | Metter, GA 30439 | $37,981 |
16 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $32,629 |
17 | Wallers Pecan Farm LLC | Metter, GA 30439 | $24,921 |
18 | Jason Robert Franklin | Metter, GA 30439 | $24,474 |
19 | Jamie Sikes Edenfield | Metter, GA 30439 | $18,346 |
20 | Allen Tyler | Metter, GA 30439 | $17,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>