Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Emanuel County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 209
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Emanuel County, Georgia totaled $702,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | W Eric Hammock | Swainsboro, GA 30401 | $30,959 |
2 | Carl M Hood Jr | Midville, GA 30441 | $24,683 |
3 | Teddy Wayne Page | Metter, GA 30439 | $23,369 |
4 | John Kelvin Turner | Twin City, GA 30471 | $22,880 |
5 | Brown Farm Partners | Garfield, GA 30425 | $22,518 |
6 | Jimmy Ray Mercer | Twin City, GA 30471 | $21,009 |
7 | Doug Bennett | Nunez, GA 30448 | $20,440 |
8 | Clay H Clark | Garfield, GA 30425 | $18,883 |
9 | Carson Cross | Midville, GA 30441 | $17,794 |
10 | Gary Cooper Henry | Twin City, GA 30471 | $17,307 |
11 | Mtms Inc | Twin City, GA 30471 | $15,552 |
12 | Johnson Land And Cattle Lp | Twin City, GA 30471 | $15,546 |
13 | Anthony W Walden | Twin City, GA 30471 | $15,078 |
14 | Christopher M Hood | Wrightsville, GA 31096 | $14,322 |
15 | Ricky G Henry | Kite, GA 31049 | $13,866 |
16 | Walter C Grimes III | Twin City, GA 30471 | $13,801 |
17 | D Jerrell Whitfield | Twin City, GA 30471 | $13,095 |
18 | Foye Bennett Whitfield | Twin City, GA 30471 | $12,956 |
19 | J Tim Garrett | Swainsboro, GA 30401 | $12,117 |
20 | Chris Ellison | Garfield, GA 30425 | $11,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>