Farm Subsidy information
Jenkins County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Jenkins County, Georgia, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 49
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jenkins County, Georgia totaled $2,674,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wade Parker | Millen, GA 30442 | $11,213 |
2 | Dobson Moran Gay III | Millen, GA 30442 | $10,361 |
3 | Alisa S Burke | Millen, GA 30442 | $9,401 |
4 | Ashley D Drake | Midville, GA 30441 | $8,771 |
5 | Rest A While Farms LLC | Moultrie, GA 31788 | $7,278 |
6 | Jimmie Menard | Perkins, GA 30442 | $5,742 |
7 | Daniel Travis Faircloth | Millen, GA 30442 | $4,558 |
8 | Kacey Lane Farms LLC | Millen, GA 30442 | $4,540 |
9 | W E Burke Jr | Millen, GA 30442 | $4,226 |
10 | W Elbert Burke Sr | Millen, GA 30442 | $4,100 |
11 | New Keller Coldbrook Plantation, LLC | Savannah, GA 31410 | $3,834 |
12 | Danny J Daughtry | Perkins, GA 30442 | $3,144 |
13 | Betty J Black | Millen, GA 30442 | $3,034 |
14 | Linda Quarles | Appling, GA 30802 | $2,945 |
15 | Deirdre C Brinson | Millen, GA 30442 | $2,876 |
16 | Howard Leroy Cook Jr | Millen, GA 30442 | $2,808 |
17 | Trust Created Fbo Kenneth R Shockley | Perkins, GA 30442 | $2,632 |
18 | Trust Created Fbo Carol F Shockley | Peachtree City, GA 30269 | $2,555 |
19 | Trust Created Fbo Thomas A Shockley | Peachtree City, GA 30269 | $2,555 |
20 | Don A Gay | Garfield, GA 30425 | $2,294 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>