Peanut Quota Buyout Program in Mitchell County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 921
Recipients of Peanut Quota Buyout Program from farms in Mitchell County, Georgia totaled $21,776,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Peanut Quota Buyout Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Riveroad Farms LLC | Camilla, GA 31730 | $160,405 |
22 | Pinecliff Peanut And Grain | Camilla, GA 31730 | $150,135 |
23 | Paul D Lane | Sale City, GA 31784 | $144,430 |
24 | Lamar Shirah | Camilla, GA 31730 | $139,630 |
25 | Jamie Harden | Camilla, GA 31730 | $135,170 |
26 | Donald Eugene Shirah | Camilla, GA 31730 | $132,680 |
27 | Hays Family Farm LLC | Sylvester, GA 31791 | $131,975 |
28 | Tom S Jackson Farms LLC C/o Davi | Baconton, GA 31716 | $127,925 |
29 | W A Snipes | Baconton, GA 31716 | $123,080 |
30 | Judy H Flournoy | Camilla, GA 31730 | $120,410 |
31 | Yrome Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $115,655 |
32 | James Wayne Eubanks | Camilla, GA 31730 | $112,765 |
33 | Bryant Campbell | Camilla, GA 31730 | $112,530 |
34 | Frank C Vann | Camilla, GA 31730 | $111,525 |
35 | Joe E Sapp | Sale City, GA 31784 | $102,600 |
36 | Susan R Sapp | Sale City, GA 31784 | $102,600 |
37 | J/l Farms Inc | Jackson, GA 30233 | $101,210 |
38 | Martin Miley Adams Dba Adams Poul | Camilla, GA 31730 | $99,375 |
39 | Crawford W Smith | Camilla, GA 31730 | $99,050 |
40 | E L Butler Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $98,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”