Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, Georgia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 414
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, Georgia totaled $21,866,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Freddie P Miller | Pelham, GA 31779 | $153,597 |
22 | Scott And Staci Vann Farms | Baconton, GA 31716 | $149,385 |
23 | Progressive Pecans Inc | Baconton, GA 31716 | $145,410 |
24 | Red Hill Farm Enterprise Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $138,919 |
25 | Jds Farms LLC | Pelham, GA 31779 | $137,964 |
26 | Crt Farms | Newton, GA 39870 | $126,708 |
27 | First State Bank Of Blakely ** | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $123,524 |
28 | Cynergy Farms | Thomasville, GA 31757 | $119,181 |
29 | Mvp Farms Gp | Newton, GA 39870 | $118,341 |
30 | Ray Bishop And Eve Bishop | Climax, GA 39834 | $111,932 |
31 | Harrison & Harrison Farms | Cairo, GA 39827 | $107,146 |
32 | Johnny Taylor Farms | Pelham, GA 31779 | $104,488 |
33 | Daniel W Connell | Sale City, GA 31784 | $102,457 |
34 | Stewart Family Farms LLC | Meigs, GA 31765 | $101,106 |
35 | Rpm Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $93,236 |
36 | Fvb Pecans Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $93,167 |
37 | Longleaf Ridge Farms LLC | Camilla, GA 31730 | $91,426 |
38 | Chason Farms | Pelham, GA 31779 | $88,560 |
39 | Billy V Faircloth | Camilla, GA 31730 | $83,895 |
40 | Mra Farms LLC | Camilla, GA 31730 | $80,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”