Farm Subsidy information
Peach County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Peach County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 424
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Peach County, Georgia totaled $55,272,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jaros Farms Inc | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $400,821 |
22 | Gatliff Farms Inc | Byron, GA 31008 | $399,796 |
23 | Frank Herbert Hiley III | Byron, GA 31008 | $397,207 |
24 | Malcolm Giles | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $357,567 |
25 | William M Giles | Byron, GA 31008 | $343,133 |
26 | Charles B Evans III | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $322,081 |
27 | Sunmark Community Bank ** | Hawkinsville, GA 31036 | $314,618 |
28 | Jane Shaw | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $302,379 |
29 | Ken Mcdonald | Sylvester, GA 31791 | $278,411 |
30 | C A Vinson And Sons | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $270,383 |
31 | Ayer's Farm Inc | Perry, GA 31069 | $269,316 |
32 | Elizabeth Evans | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $255,290 |
33 | Lemario Nicholas Brown | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $251,501 |
34 | Evans Investment Company | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $248,471 |
35 | Roquemore Farms | Lakeland, GA 31635 | $242,311 |
36 | Stoffell Farms LLC | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $237,489 |
37 | Hancock Farms | Byron, GA 31008 | $206,110 |
38 | Dickey Farms Inc | Musella, GA 31066 | $198,503 |
39 | Pete Renner | Perry, GA 31069 | $183,025 |
40 | Peachtree Farms | Perry, GA 31069 | $181,270 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”