Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Hawaii County, Hawaii, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 161
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Hawaii County, Hawaii totaled $3,975,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kahua Ranch Limited | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $217,860 |
2 | Kuahiwi Contractors Inc | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $176,361 |
3 | Kamuela Dairy Inc | Visalia, CA 93292 | $141,256 |
4 | Harold Frederick Rice Jr | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $138,331 |
5 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $128,956 |
6 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $123,664 |
7 | Palani Ranch Company Inc | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $119,143 |
8 | Daleico Ranch | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $110,271 |
9 | Island Dairy Inc | Palmetto, FL 34221 | $105,886 |
10 | Charles Tatsuo Onaka | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $101,531 |
11 | Boteilho Hawaii Enterprises Inc | Hawi, HI 96719 | $100,002 |
12 | Virginio C Aguiar Jr | Ninole, HI 96773 | $96,029 |
13 | Freddy Nobriga Enterprises Inc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $94,280 |
14 | S & S Dairy Inc | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $94,103 |
15 | Brenda L Deluz-campbell | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $90,557 |
16 | Ernest Deluz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $89,121 |
17 | Kk Ranch Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $88,268 |
18 | Palekoki Ranch Inc | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $85,069 |
19 | Ponoholo Ranch Ltd | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $80,000 |
20 | Louis A Nobriga | Laupahoehoe, HI 96764 | $72,548 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>