Farm Subsidy information
Bear Lake County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Bear Lake County, Idaho, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 292
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bear Lake County, Idaho totaled $2,844,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Barker Ag | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $195,519 |
2 | Golden Valley Idaho Farms LLC | Grace, ID 83241 | $146,958 |
3 | Brad Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $110,479 |
4 | Lee Ann Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $102,499 |
5 | Bryce Crane | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $101,181 |
6 | Phelps Brothers Partnership | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $61,701 |
7 | Nebeker Bros | Salt Lake City, UT 84108 | $61,013 |
8 | 3 Mile Dairy Incorporated | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $57,407 |
9 | Treygen Nelson | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $54,641 |
10 | Mahogany Ridge Dairy Farms | Geneva, ID 83238 | $50,633 |
11 | Bear Lake Ranch LLC | Morgan, UT 84050 | $49,903 |
12 | J R Ream Ranch Inc | Dingle, ID 83233 | $41,426 |
13 | Fred Hunzeker & Sons | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $40,502 |
14 | P. Thomas Blotter Ranch, L.c. | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $40,434 |
15 | Heart-o-rose Dairy LLC | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $35,810 |
16 | Lee Nelson | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $33,167 |
17 | Edward W Kunz | Bern, ID 83220 | $32,921 |
18 | Jed Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $32,253 |
19 | James Hardcastle | Bern, ID 83220 | $32,190 |
20 | William Blair Robison | Dingle, ID 83233 | $31,957 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>