Farm Subsidy information
Boise County, Idaho
Total Subsidies in Boise County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 114
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Boise County, Idaho totaled $2,457,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Advantage Crossbreds LLC | Nampa, ID 83687 | $105,506 |
2 | Bryan Brodin | Nampa, ID 83687 | $90,278 |
3 | Roy Moses | Sweet, ID 83670 | $86,617 |
4 | Stephen Dobson | Horseshoe Bend, ID 83629 | $79,868 |
5 | Harvey Church | Sweet, ID 83670 | $62,773 |
6 | Bryan R Moses | Horseshoe Bend, ID 83629 | $57,730 |
7 | Dobson Livestock LLC | Horseshoe Bend, ID 83629 | $54,236 |
8 | Todd C Niehoff Dba Niehoff Logging | Idaho City, ID 83631 | $52,875 |
9 | Gary C Biggers | Sweet, ID 83670 | $49,567 |
10 | Donald K Weilmunster | Garden Valley, ID 83622 | $48,082 |
11 | Frank J Thurman | Caldwell, ID 83607 | $41,977 |
12 | Little Land & Livestock Lllp | Emmett, ID 83617 | $39,779 |
13 | Jvb Livestock LLC | Emmett, ID 83617 | $39,562 |
14 | Rex Lanham Jr | Boise, ID 83716 | $33,700 |
15 | Tracy Irish | Montour, ID 83617 | $31,810 |
16 | Matthew D Nauman | New Plymouth, ID 83655 | $30,884 |
17 | Jay A Branch | Horseshoe Bend, ID 83629 | $29,332 |
18 | Fry Ranch | Horseshoe Bend, ID 83629 | $28,005 |
19 | John A Fry | Horseshoe Bend, ID 83629 | $26,507 |
20 | Michael Dean Fry | Horseshoe Bend, ID 83629 | $26,444 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>