Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Minidoka County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 103
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Minidoka County, Idaho totaled $3,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jentzsch-kearl Farms | Rupert, ID 83350 | $515,524 |
2 | B & H Farming | Rupert, ID 83350 | $224,962 |
3 | Hansen Farms Joint Venture | Rupert, ID 83350 | $190,463 |
4 | Timm Adams Farms Inc | Rupert, ID 83350 | $168,882 |
5 | Grant 4-d Farms LLC | Rupert, ID 83350 | $167,657 |
6 | Randy Gillette Farms Inc | Paul, ID 83347 | $160,098 |
7 | Bryan D Jentzsch | Rupert, ID 83350 | $148,908 |
8 | Harper Grain Co | Paul, ID 83347 | $135,583 |
9 | Harper Family LLC | Paul, ID 83347 | $123,938 |
10 | Perry Gillette Farms Inc | Paul, ID 83347 | $116,248 |
11 | John Peter Hansen | Rupert, ID 83350 | $92,876 |
12 | Rodney Hansen Farms Inc | Paul, ID 83347 | $78,560 |
13 | Alan Woodland | Paul, ID 83347 | $74,594 |
14 | B & B Dairy LLC | Rupert, ID 83350 | $69,944 |
15 | David Frank Rollheiser | Rupert, ID 83350 | $67,515 |
16 | Greg & Dana Cameron Joint Venture | Rupert, ID 83350 | $66,346 |
17 | John Rett Cameron | Rupert, ID 83350 | $64,817 |
18 | Kostka Farms Inc | Heyburn, ID 83336 | $61,632 |
19 | Tuma Farms Inc | Rupert, ID 83350 | $56,755 |
20 | D N Ag Corporation | Paul, ID 83347 | $50,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>