Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Nez Perce County, Idaho, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 109
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Nez Perce County, Idaho totaled $904,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Woodland Apiaries LLC | Moscow, ID 83843 | $111,838 |
2 | Hewett Ranch Inc | Juliaetta, ID 83535 | $60,690 |
3 | Van Buren Ranch LLC | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $57,568 |
4 | Larry Boyer Land & Cattle | Culdesac, ID 83524 | $53,757 |
5 | Paul Richard Eke | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $30,440 |
6 | Wittman Farms Inc | Lapwai, ID 83540 | $30,105 |
7 | Benjamin J Forsman | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $27,631 |
8 | Phil Heitstuman Land & Cattle, LLC | Culdesac, ID 83524 | $25,155 |
9 | Dan Colbaugh | Kendrick, ID 83537 | $22,844 |
10 | Shannon Stout | Genesee, ID 83832 | $21,027 |
11 | Tom R Ball | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $19,605 |
12 | Dmj Farms | Lenore, ID 83541 | $18,440 |
13 | Brad Stout | Genesee, ID 83832 | $18,272 |
14 | Byron T Rudolph Sr | Lapwai, ID 83540 | $15,871 |
15 | Wayne Heitstuman | Anatone, WA 99401 | $15,435 |
16 | Gary Schwartz | Culdesac, ID 83524 | $15,403 |
17 | Shelly Oconnell | Genesee, ID 83832 | $15,382 |
18 | C J Mosman And Son | Craigmont, ID 83523 | $15,014 |
19 | Camas Prairie Ranch LLC | Reubens, ID 83548 | $14,648 |
20 | Clinton E Mader | Cottonwood, ID 83522 | $13,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>