Total Commodity Programs in Oneida County, Idaho, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 366
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $3,034,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bird Brothers Farms LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $41,993 |
22 | Jeff E Alder | Malad City, ID 83252 | $41,763 |
23 | Willie Cattle Company LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $36,672 |
24 | Paul Hubbard Transport, Inc. | Malad City, ID 83252 | $36,543 |
25 | Daniel R Daniels | Malad City, ID 83252 | $35,784 |
26 | Susan Wittman | Malad City, ID 83252 | $35,254 |
27 | Klm Farms LLC | Erda, UT 84074 | $30,359 |
28 | Eliason Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $29,873 |
29 | Potter Ranches LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $29,708 |
30 | Meadow Ranch LLC | Idaho Falls, ID 83402 | $29,400 |
31 | Steve Criddle | Downey, ID 83234 | $28,072 |
32 | Steven Hess | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $27,122 |
33 | Douglas J Mills | Malad City, ID 83252 | $26,247 |
34 | Austin Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $24,953 |
35 | Gd Farms LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $24,879 |
36 | Campbell Farm Enterprises Inc | Malta, ID 83342 | $24,175 |
37 | Kay C Alder & Son Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $24,064 |
38 | Merrell A Nelson & Son | Malta, ID 83342 | $24,014 |
39 | Firth Brothers Cattle Company LLC | Malad, ID 83252 | $23,995 |
40 | Brad Woolstenhulme | Montpelier, ID 83254 | $23,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”