Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Illinois, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 200
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Illinois totaled $8,331,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pearl Valley Farms Inc | Pearl City, IL 61062 | $1,498,964 |
2 | Stoecker Farms Inc | Litchfield, IL 62056 | $540,000 |
3 | Monke Farms Inc | Litchfield, IL 62056 | $500,040 |
4 | High Plains Pork Inc | Winslow, IL 61089 | $485,892 |
5 | Phils Fresh Eggs Inc | Pearl City, IL 61062 | $260,318 |
6 | Borgic Pork Partners, Ltd | Raymond, IL 62560 | $255,798 |
7 | Crawford Hog Farms LLC | Arenzville, IL 62611 | $201,960 |
8 | High Ridge Pork LLC | Chapin, IL 62628 | $199,638 |
9 | Bernhard Farms Inc | Elwood, IL 60421 | $190,512 |
10 | Phils Eggs LLC | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $166,458 |
11 | Illini Hi Tech Inc | Kingston, IL 60145 | $152,000 |
12 | Shaffer Brothers Partnership | Ursa, IL 62376 | $138,186 |
13 | J D S Holliday | Greenview, IL 62642 | $131,274 |
14 | Gene W Maves | Peotone, IL 60468 | $117,666 |
15 | David Eugene Helregel | Willow Hill, IL 62480 | $113,508 |
16 | Larry A Hermanns | Coulterville, IL 62237 | $108,702 |
17 | Jason Potter | Neoga, IL 62447 | $103,842 |
18 | Special K Hog Farm | Chenoa, IL 61726 | $89,532 |
19 | Kjmm Partnership | New Athens, IL 62264 | $86,940 |
20 | Flood Brothers | Dieterich, IL 62424 | $86,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>