Total Conservation Programs in Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 41,943
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Illinois totaled $166,484,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ricketts So Il Gp | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $128,250 |
2 | Lumpp Family Farms Gp | Tallula, IL 62688 | $102,464 |
3 | Gilmore Farm Partnership | Jacksonville, IL 62650 | $97,314 |
4 | Abk Co | Easton, IL 62633 | $89,394 |
5 | Nadiaim Farms LLC | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $82,344 |
6 | Mark And Rose Shedd | Rockton, IL 61072 | $82,050 |
7 | Wayne F Arseneau | Beaverville, IL 60912 | $80,361 |
8 | Kirk & Sharon Sims Joint Venture | New Windsor, IL 61465 | $80,114 |
9 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $75,556 |
10 | Lakosky Land And Farm Partnership | Keosauqua, IA 52565 | $73,922 |
11 | Dale Heye | Bath, IL 62617 | $73,059 |
12 | Kent Brothers | Clarksville, TN 37043 | $68,954 |
13 | Wilcox Farm Partners | Chandlerville, IL 62627 | $68,340 |
14 | B Bar B Farm | Carman, IL 61425 | $66,522 |
15 | Bank Of Springfield ** | Jacksonville, IL 62650 | $66,350 |
16 | Trask Bridge Farms | Pecatonica, IL 61063 | $63,910 |
17 | Cole Sims | New Windsor, IL 61465 | $62,210 |
18 | Leona Massey | Jacksonville, IL 62650 | $58,544 |
19 | Stoddard Partners | Monticello, IL 61856 | $56,558 |
20 | Linda K Sandidge | Chandlerville, IL 62627 | $56,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>