Conservation Reserve Program in Kankakee County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 748
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Kankakee County, Illinois totaled $14,044,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Winterroth | Herscher, IL 60941 | $73,704 |
42 | Travis Barker | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $72,935 |
43 | Patrick J O'connor | Kankakee, IL 60901 | $72,032 |
44 | James Hanley-james C Hanley Trust | Streator, IL 61364 | $71,365 |
45 | Matthew J Nutting | Chicago, IL 60645 | $69,172 |
46 | Jeff S Van Drunen | Dyer, IN 46311 | $68,693 |
47 | Edna Prince Tr | Bonfield, IL 60913 | $68,062 |
48 | Adam Wagner | Buckingham, IL 60917 | $65,422 |
49 | Perreault Farms Inc | Kankakee, IL 60901 | $65,100 |
50 | Municipal Trust & Savings Bank Tr | Grant Park, IL 60940 | $64,293 |
51 | William Munyon Jr | Momence, IL 60954 | $63,208 |
52 | Robert Kevin Kohl | Bourbonnais, IL 60914 | $62,015 |
53 | Charles R Hoffeditz | Manteno, IL 60950 | $61,188 |
54 | Richard T Maley | Surprise, AZ 85379 | $61,023 |
55 | Wayne Sims | Herscher, IL 60941 | $60,723 |
56 | Jack Henning | Momence, IL 60954 | $60,576 |
57 | Henry Medler | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $59,588 |
58 | Patricia Lamore | Manteno, IL 60950 | $58,248 |
59 | Ampat Inc | Kankakee, IL 60901 | $57,748 |
60 | Richard E Sims | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $56,672 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”