Farm Subsidy information
Wabash County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Wabash County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 480
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $7,179,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chad A Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $48,942 |
22 | Slr Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $47,410 |
23 | Chris & John F Dunkel Partners | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $40,876 |
24 | Cusick Farms | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $40,258 |
25 | Matthew Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $37,930 |
26 | L Todd Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $37,798 |
27 | Larry D Seals | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $36,673 |
28 | Hill View Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $35,805 |
29 | Dan Strine Farms Inc | West Salem, IL 62476 | $33,842 |
30 | Larry G Hocking & Sons LLC | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $31,348 |
31 | Kent E Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $30,222 |
32 | Berberosa Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $30,164 |
33 | Joseph Tennes | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $29,276 |
34 | Dwr Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $26,873 |
35 | Leland Keith Marriott | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $25,931 |
36 | Alka Family Farms LLC | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $24,716 |
37 | Willis Stanley Kelsey | Allendale, IL 62410 | $23,492 |
38 | Ryan A Peter | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $22,089 |
39 | Kurt Duane Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $21,020 |
40 | Robert Trapp Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $20,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”