Market Gains in Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 8,007
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Indiana totaled $186,849,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Huffer Brothers Inc No 2 | Cutler, IN 46920 | $299,498 |
22 | Huffer Bros Inc | Cutler, IN 46920 | $286,211 |
23 | Styck Bros Inc | Morocco, IN 47963 | $283,233 |
24 | Lantz & Corwin General Partners | New Palestine, IN 46163 | $282,386 |
25 | Long & Hufford Farms Inc | Rossville, IN 46065 | $276,337 |
26 | Thomas A Stoy | Ashley, IN 46705 | $274,128 |
27 | James Sullivan | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $269,168 |
28 | Joe Proctor | New Castle, IN 47362 | $265,180 |
29 | Charles Michael Presnall | Jonesboro, IN 46938 | $264,456 |
30 | Mike And Jeff Buis Partnership | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $264,349 |
31 | Shane Meier Farms Inc | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $264,330 |
32 | Windy Lane Farms Inc | Mulberry, IN 46058 | $259,976 |
33 | Schafer Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $258,598 |
34 | Eric D Lawyer D/b/a Eric & Peggy Lawyer Family Fa | Shirley, IN 47384 | $255,168 |
35 | James R Huffer | Frankfort, IN 46041 | $253,075 |
36 | Marion C Huffer | Cutler, IN 46920 | $253,075 |
37 | Likens Farms | Anderson, IN 46011 | $253,069 |
38 | Graham Farms Inc | Washington, IN 47501 | $252,417 |
39 | Randall E Pitts | Hagerstown, IN 47346 | $248,606 |
40 | Harold E Dilts | Pleasant Lake, IN 46779 | $245,874 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”