Total Commodity Programs in Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 150,421
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Indiana totaled $11,069,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wright Agri Group Gp | Covington, IN 47932 | $3,931,496 |
22 | Boyd Grain Farms | Washington, IN 47501 | $3,917,885 |
23 | Bowman Farms | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $3,829,248 |
24 | Rose Brothers Farms | Rockville, IN 47872 | $3,800,948 |
25 | Styck & Sons | Morocco, IN 47963 | $3,782,998 |
26 | Stoy Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $3,774,950 |
27 | Holderby Holderby & Holderby | Morocco, IN 47963 | $3,748,504 |
28 | S & C Cornelius Farms | Switz City, IN 47465 | $3,733,809 |
29 | Hartman Farms | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $3,676,058 |
30 | Lichtenbarger Farms | South Bend, IN 46628 | $3,664,449 |
31 | Slipher Farms | Thorntown, IN 46071 | $3,662,214 |
32 | Ramsay Farms | Rockville, IN 47872 | $3,642,996 |
33 | Steve & Eleanora Elpers | Evansville, IN 47725 | $3,642,871 |
34 | Breneman Farm Management | Clayton, IN 46118 | $3,639,566 |
35 | Kline Family Farms Partnership | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $3,627,896 |
36 | Pathway Family Farms | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $3,608,630 |
37 | Maple Pork Farms | Kokomo, IN 46901 | $3,574,884 |
38 | Metzger Dairy Inc | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $3,529,839 |
39 | Law Brothers Partnership | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $3,524,549 |
40 | Rulon Enterprises LLC | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $3,508,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”