Conservation Reserve Program in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 793
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bartholomew County, Indiana totaled $16,460,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bush Farm Enterprises Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $103,125 |
22 | John M Burbrink | Columbus, IN 47203 | $102,649 |
23 | Ronald H Hoevener | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $102,604 |
24 | Wayne Gentry | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $102,198 |
25 | George R Hege | Columbus, IN 47203 | $101,266 |
26 | Curtis Burbrink | Columbus, IN 47201 | $98,930 |
27 | Dennis Brooks | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $96,899 |
28 | Bryan Schroer | Columbus, IN 47201 | $96,377 |
29 | G Robert Harden | Seymour, IN 47274 | $95,675 |
30 | James Norris | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $94,608 |
31 | David Hoene | Seymour, IN 47274 | $94,520 |
32 | Stephen D Anthers | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $92,869 |
33 | G & R Burbrink Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $92,552 |
34 | Rcw Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $89,992 |
35 | Dunfee Farms LLC | Columbus, IN 47201 | $87,420 |
36 | Herschel Kleffman | Seymour, IN 47274 | $87,063 |
37 | Benjamin Peters | Columbus, IN 47201 | $85,758 |
38 | Huffman Brothers Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $85,541 |
39 | Meyer Hog Farm | Columbus, IN 47201 | $83,761 |
40 | Max Jacobus | Columbus, IN 47201 | $83,436 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”