Conservation Reserve Program in Benton County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 463
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Benton County, Indiana totaled $1,049,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | A M Skinner Farms Inc | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $68,059 |
2 | Daniel Ransom | Fowler, IN 47944 | $33,065 |
3 | Robert-robert G Sondgeroth Rlt G Sondgeroth | Boswell, IN 47921 | $33,004 |
4 | Janet-janet M Sondgeroth Rlt M Sondgeroth | Boswell, IN 47921 | $25,293 |
5 | Nancy K Fuqua | Fortville, IN 46040 | $25,130 |
6 | George P Wallpe | Boswell, IN 47921 | $21,363 |
7 | Susan D Wallpe | Boswell, IN 47921 | $21,363 |
8 | , | $20,567 | |
9 | Kenneth Kult | Ambia, IN 47917 | $20,106 |
10 | Berry Farms Of Fowler Inc | Fowler, IN 47944 | $19,871 |
11 | Srk Farms LLC | Lafayette, IN 47905 | $14,313 |
12 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $14,037 |
13 | , | $13,448 | |
14 | Maurice-neville Liv Trust-neville | Otterbein, IN 47970 | $12,679 |
15 | Dd Budreau Farms LLC | Fowler, IN 47944 | $12,603 |
16 | Jennie E Caldwell Trust | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $11,981 |
17 | Gregory L Johnson | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $11,751 |
18 | Susan E Mccallister Revocable Living Trust | Pine Village, IN 47975 | $10,394 |
19 | Max E Jackson Revocable Trust | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $10,230 |
20 | Kirk Lee Clute | Oxford, IN 47971 | $9,101 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>