Direct Payment Program in Blackford County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 384
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Blackford County, Indiana totaled $11,626,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kline Family Farms Partnership | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $793,903 |
2 | Stroble Farms Inc | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $433,473 |
3 | Wilson Grain Farms Inc | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $414,798 |
4 | Langdon Bros Seed | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $366,114 |
5 | Mccammon Farms Inc | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $319,555 |
6 | Gailon R Light | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $312,317 |
7 | C & F Walker Inc | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $278,640 |
8 | Josh Light | Muncie, IN 47303 | $268,238 |
9 | Rhett Light | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $266,120 |
10 | Said Farms | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $254,016 |
11 | Garrett Land Corporation | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $237,841 |
12 | Wes Wilson | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $223,752 |
13 | Paul D Marshall | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $212,691 |
14 | William R Wrightsman | Dunkirk, IN 47336 | $194,731 |
15 | W Wayne Townsend | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $189,232 |
16 | Said Farms LLC | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $189,150 |
17 | Price Farms Inc | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $176,258 |
18 | Brian D Goodspeed | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $166,226 |
19 | Catherine Ann Enochs | Marana, AZ 85658 | $164,437 |
20 | Ronald L Enochs | Marana, AZ 85658 | $164,434 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>