Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Clay County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,338
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, Indiana totaled $12,863,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stevenson Farms | Brazil, IN 47834 | $280,639 |
2 | Koehler Family Farms LLC | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $267,028 |
3 | Cooprider & Sons | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $258,964 |
4 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $236,495 |
5 | Be-n-ag Farms | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $232,687 |
6 | Butts Prairie Acres LLC | Cory, IN 47846 | $208,641 |
7 | B Youngblood Farms LLC | Brazil, IN 47834 | $177,367 |
8 | D Youngblood Farms LLC | Brazil, IN 47834 | $177,361 |
9 | Jeffrey D Hyatt | Clay City, IN 47841 | $156,867 |
10 | Shidler Ag Solutions LLC | Clay City, IN 47841 | $151,592 |
11 | Nicoson Farms Inc | Cory, IN 47846 | $136,629 |
12 | Evans & Sons Farms LLC | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $136,239 |
13 | Neese Family Farms LLC | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $132,102 |
14 | Marlin B Schopmeyer | Bowling Green, IN 47833 | $127,393 |
15 | Curtis G Griffith | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $125,135 |
16 | W Morris Family Farms LLC | Clay City, IN 47841 | $122,895 |
17 | Joe Gerber | Clay City, IN 47841 | $121,977 |
18 | Clint E Groover | Clay City, IN 47841 | $121,294 |
19 | Dc Brown Farms LLC | Centerpoint, IN 47840 | $119,299 |
20 | Robert J Wise | Jasonville, IN 47438 | $117,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>