Conservation Reserve Program in Dearborn County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 101
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Dearborn County, Indiana totaled $897,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Patty D Mcqueen | Fairfield, OH 45014 | $67,727 |
2 | H Donald Evans | Harrison, OH 45030 | $62,229 |
3 | Daniel Joseph Trabel | Sunman, IN 47041 | $53,735 |
4 | Janice Ratliff | Sunman, IN 47041 | $51,969 |
5 | Jo Ann Claar | Sunman, IN 47041 | $35,504 |
6 | Dearborn County Government | Lawrenceburg, IN 47025 | $32,931 |
7 | Murphy Realty Company | Cincinnati, OH 45238 | $27,438 |
8 | Jerry F Bulach | Brookville, IN 47012 | $26,960 |
9 | Julius C Mcqueen | Fairfield, OH 45014 | $25,036 |
10 | Clifford J Bischoff | Brookville, IN 47012 | $24,009 |
11 | John J Seubert | Sunman, IN 47041 | $20,134 |
12 | William S Corning | Versailles, IN 47042 | $18,816 |
13 | Stanley E Kess Jr Irrevocable Tru | Moores Hill, IN 47032 | $18,005 |
14 | Oxbow Of Indiana Inc | Lawrenceburg, IN 47025 | $17,740 |
15 | Richard J Luke | Dillsboro, IN 47018 | $16,917 |
16 | Leonard I Lanvermeyer | Moores Hill, IN 47032 | $15,696 |
17 | Stanley E Kess Jr | Moores Hill, IN 47032 | $15,309 |
18 | Oxbow Of Indiana Inc | Cincinnati, OH 45218 | $14,753 |
19 | Dennis R Watson | Moores Hill, IN 47032 | $14,008 |
20 | Walter R Schantz | Brookville, IN 47012 | $13,774 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>