Total Disaster Programs in Gibson County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 701
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $16,966,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frey Brothers | Keenes, IL 62851 | $3,238,425 |
2 | Bingham Farms | Patoka, IN 47666 | $938,100 |
3 | Pathway Family Farms | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $617,485 |
4 | Robert Haase Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $443,092 |
5 | Wm Clark Bugher | Patoka, IN 47666 | $331,839 |
6 | Stephen W Marvel | Princeton, IN 47670 | $300,673 |
7 | Ronald D Hudson | Patoka, IN 47666 | $267,543 |
8 | Edward D Horrall | Patoka, IN 47666 | $250,217 |
9 | David L Haase Revocable Trust | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $247,409 |
10 | John D Grigsby Jr | Owensville, IN 47665 | $232,946 |
11 | Maple Land Co LLC | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $223,244 |
12 | Steelman Farms Inc | Patoka, IN 47666 | $215,104 |
13 | Alan Sensmeier Farms Inc | Owensville, IN 47665 | $160,536 |
14 | Jay Sensmeier | Owensville, IN 47665 | $153,336 |
15 | Donald E Hale | Owensville, IN 47665 | $147,480 |
16 | Marvel Family Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $134,852 |
17 | Don Pflug Farms Inc | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $133,689 |
18 | South Gibson Grain Inc. | Princeton, IN 47670 | $131,567 |
19 | Mcconnell Farms LLC | Princeton, IN 47670 | $131,494 |
20 | Heidenreich Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $131,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>