Conservation Reserve Program in Hamilton County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 165
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hamilton County, Indiana totaled $2,742,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Law Brothers Partnership | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $32,169 |
22 | Emma Lou Fulton | Anderson, IN 46012 | $31,959 |
23 | Barbara E Chamness | Carmel, IN 46033 | $27,254 |
24 | Kendall Reagan Farms | Indianapolis, IN 46220 | $26,500 |
25 | Tammy Hilfiker | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $26,355 |
26 | Leanna Roberts | Westfield, IN 46074 | $26,235 |
27 | Charles Trubey | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $26,142 |
28 | Hunt Real Estate LLC | Carmel, IN 46033 | $26,015 |
29 | Owen Thomas Crehan Jr | Tipton, IN 46072 | $25,811 |
30 | Mari J Briggs Revocable Trust | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $25,287 |
31 | Charles Alan Davis | Westfield, IN 46074 | $25,176 |
32 | Csds Properties LLC | Westfield, IN 46074 | $23,382 |
33 | John Dean Farms Inc | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $22,850 |
34 | Gregory Elsner | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $21,982 |
35 | Cardinal Real Estate Holdings LLC | Westfield, IN 46074 | $21,567 |
36 | James T Harger | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $21,007 |
37 | Shane M Worthman | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $20,161 |
38 | Bill Rodecker | Fishers, IN 46037 | $19,779 |
39 | Overdorf & Kelley Inc | Logansport, IN 46947 | $18,921 |
40 | David Aerne | Noblesville, IN 46061 | $18,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”