Production Flexibility Program in La Porte County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,222
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $28,393,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Yon-ed Farm Inc | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $166,942 |
22 | Howard E Ewen | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $162,664 |
23 | Robert M Barr Trust No 19 | Laporte, IN 46350 | $160,626 |
24 | Jack L Williams | La Porte, IN 46350 | $155,252 |
25 | Paul Fischer | La Porte, IN 46350 | $149,406 |
26 | Warren Burch | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $147,960 |
27 | R & J Gumz Farms Inc | North Judson, IN 46366 | $146,376 |
28 | Susan Jean Griffin | Postville, IA 52162 | $145,273 |
29 | Glenn Richard Griffin | Postville, IA 52162 | $145,273 |
30 | David P Sabones | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $141,189 |
31 | Arndt Farms | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $139,394 |
32 | Dale R Tuholski | La Porte, IN 46350 | $138,957 |
33 | Ro-ka Farms Inc | Westville, IN 46391 | $138,443 |
34 | A & H Limited Partnership | Laporte, IN 46350 | $137,872 |
35 | Harold L Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $135,912 |
36 | Martin Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $135,912 |
37 | Robert A Rosenbaum | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $135,797 |
38 | Phillip M Hagenow | Westville, IN 46391 | $135,362 |
39 | Tom Peeples | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $133,974 |
40 | John A Sampson | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $133,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”